BACKGROUND IMAGE: iSTOCK/GETTY IMAGES

CIO Decisions

Why data lake governance is key to modern data architecture

iSTOCK/GETTY IMAGES

Get started Bring yourself up to speed with our introductory content.

Attention, CIOs and other humans: Advances in robotics will reshape society

Robots are on track to be faster and smarter than humans -- someday they'll be as creative, too, says robotics engineer Hod Lipson. Now is the time to prepare.

Reports of robots posing a threat to jobs are about as numerous as the ones that tell us to keep calm. Machines may do calculations swiftly, the soothsayers say, but they can't match humans' capacity for creativity.

Not yet, anyway. Columbia University's Hod Lipson gives it less than a century.

"What do people do, what happens to social structure, when machines can do most things better than most people?" the renowned robotics engineer asked at MIT's recent EmTech event in Cambridge, Mass. "This is not some hypothetical question about the future of AI [artificial intelligence] a million years from today. It's probably in the lifetime of our children -- it's something that we have to certainly start thinking about seriously."

CIOs are part of that we. Yes, today's chief information officers are probably safe from being replaced by automaton IT executives that are better, faster and cheaper -- even as companies invest in the next wave of digital technologies like cognitive computing. But advances in robotics, as Lipson noted, have implications far greater than the viability of any one corporate role.

Lipson works on "machine creativity," or endowing machines with the attribute human beings have long claimed as uniquely their own. He builds robots that do more than aggregate and analyze data; they generate "a lot of good stuff," including paintings and even other machines. But they're not simply equipped with high-tech printers or other tools; these are products of -- mirabile dictu -- imagination.

Hod Lipson, Columbia University robotics engineer, responds to MIT Technology Review editor David Rotman at MIT's EmTech event.
Columbia University robotics engineer Hod Lipson (right) answers a question posed by MIT Technology Review editor David Rotman, at MIT's recent EmTech event in Cambridge, Mass.

"If you ask almost any parent to talk about their child, if they talk about how bright their child is, usually they will talk about how creative and curious their child is," Lipson said. "We think that is something that's very, very human and very unique."

Creative directors

But creativity is notoriously difficult to teach even to humans. That's because we don't exactly know where our ideas come from. For machines, it's even harder, Lipson said, which is why AI has focused for so long on analysis. Computers can predict the stock market, the weather and what we're going to buy, but they can't come up with the idea for driverless cars.

Advances in robotics may change that. Lipson is taking the robot-building process out of human hands and turning it over to evolution, which he calls "the mother of creativity." Robot components like wires and motors are combined in a simulated evolutionary engine and piece themselves together. Robots are formed and tested, offspring are created through variation and crossbreeding -- and out comes a primitive-looking robot with tubular appendages and a finlike tail that helps it crawl through sand. Lipson hopes to move all the way up the chain, wherever that may lead.

That machines can come close to anything remotely resembling human evolution is bound to touch a nerve with a lot of folks. And rightly so. Lipson's success would mark the end of civilization as we know it -- never mind the supplanting of jobs that once provided comfortable middle-class lifestyles for millions.

Ex machina

In a 2014 Pew Research Center study, half of the 1,896 industry observers surveyed predicted that vast numbers of not only blue-collar manufacturing jobs will be taken in coming years by robotics and artificial intelligence but white-collar ones too. More recently, Forrester Research Inc. published a report that was generally sunny on the future job outlook. Still, it predicted that 22.7 million jobs -- 16% of the U.S. job market -- would be displaced by technologies, far outnumbering the 13.6 million they would create.

Meantime, the popularity of cognitive computing -- robot brains, if you will -- is surging. IBM recently founded a business unit to promote its supercomputer Watson as a cloud service, and research outfit IDC says more than 50% of developer teams will use some form of cognitive technology in their apps by 2018. In customer service, for example, cognitive systems can tap reams of customer data to answer questions in a conversational tone. In healthcare, they can spot genetic patterns in patients to help them make better decisions about their health.

And these are just apps. What happens when Lipson's evolutionary process produces a race of Renaissance robots?

"This is a forum for 'can we do it?'" said Jimmy Jia, an MIT grad and CEO of Distributed Energy Management who was in Cambridge for EmTech. The Seattle company he co-founded helps businesses manage their use of utilities like electricity and water. "Whether we should is another forum."

A place for us

For Lipson, there's no going back. Robots will get their share of creativity, and -- the hope is -- they'll use it to help humans come up with innovations they wouldn't have thought of otherwise.

"I think the real question in the long term is, 'How do we restructure our economy?'" he said. "We have to think about new ways of creating meaning and creating accomplishment through other things like art, sports, education -- things that are more transformative but are self-defined. That's a good place to look at."

He has a lot of company. In an open letter in the July/August issue of MIT Technology Review, MIT's Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, authors of The Second Machine Age, and a slew of others, including Salesforce's Marc Benioff, wrote that advances in robotics won't lead to a jobless future -- if governments forge the right policies. They need to make increased investments in education, infrastructure and R&D. And business leaders have no small task either, they wrote. They must reimagine the goals of corporations they're guiding into the future -- from mere profit centers to civic institutions that embrace "inclusive prosperity."

Other pundits call for guaranteed income for all as a way to combat a future where robots do all the work. CIOs, that's probably not something that's going to win you plaudits in the C-suite. But as you push toward a digital future, as you should, think of your children. And think of your children's children.

Article 5 of 5

Next Steps

Advances in robotics means smart machines get smarter

Robots taking your job? Nonsense, said ComputerWeekly's Bryan Glick

Have a look at 10 of today's robots

This was last published in November 2015

Dig Deeper on Business automation, robotics and business process management

Join the conversation

8 comments

Send me notifications when other members comment.

Please create a username to comment.

Do you think you'll see a day when advances in robotics put you out of a job?
Cancel
I've never bought the put us out of a job meme. If the robots take over certain tasks, well, we have the same amount of raw goods and services as a society as we used to, and that job doesn't need to get done anymore. So the society has more wealth, not less.

My guess is we'll see people shifting to become authors, improvement experts, marketers, and so on, if and when the manual jobs go away. That's a good thing; it means a world with more art and new ideas.

Will computers become smart enough to take those roles? Not in my lifetime, or the lifetime of my children. When 2025 hits and we don't see the singularity, I want a t-shirt or something.
Cancel
I agree. Not in this lifetime! Definitely not something that I'm worried about.
Cancel
There’s an excellent book by Harry Collins and Martin Kusch that addresses this problem. It’s titled “The Shape of Actions - What Humans and Machines Can Do.” It’s not a light read, but it essentially says that there are things that a human can do that a machine can’t, and there are things that a human or a machine can do that are not feasible for the machine to do. So no, I don’t think that advances in robotics will put me out of a job.
Cancel
Hmm.. I was just going to write that some jobs, like lighthouse keeper, might be not needed anymore due to computer navigation, radars, sonars, and GPS. So in my tester's habit I only wanted to check with google.. And voila!

http://lighthousememories.ca/jobs/#.VroyoU88rzg
http://www.insidejobs.com/careers/lighthouse-keeper



Cancel
IT people have been leveraging automation for decades.   It used to be called compiling, then code generation.  Today It's deployment pipelines.
Cancel
Depends on the job. Manual labor, sure. Customer interaction is already here though behaving pretty poorly, annoying more customers than helping. Information flow, absolutely. Information generation, not so much. OTOH, I read far too many "newspaper" articles that have been machine generated. They can range from unreadable to ludicrous to passable.They're nowhere near able to replace high-end journalism, but they're getting better all the time. It's already clear they can generate readable articles from data and a few stray comments.

When...? I have no idea, but I'm certain the future will look little like the past.
Cancel
I hope not. That's all we need is self programming robots. All that is needed is on hack into the main robot and have it replicated over and over...I'm thinking real life Terminator..
Cancel

Get More CIO Decisions

Access to all of our back issues View All

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchCompliance

SearchHealthIT

SearchCloudComputing

SearchMobileComputing

SearchDataCenter

Close