Manage Learn to apply best practices and optimize your operations.

CIOs must keep slow enterprise virtualization rolling along

Once a bleeding-edge technology, virtualization is finding its way slowly into all corners of modern organizations. CIOs must keep the drumbeat going.

This article can also be found in the Premium Editorial Download: CIO Decisions: How CIOs can take control over data storage virtualization:

Every couple of years, I conduct a bit of personal research on the state of virtualization. Four years ago, most...

of us had virtualized our non-mission-critical systems and services, while just a few of us had virtualized such things as our production database servers and our email systems. Two years ago, most of us had virtualized most of our mission-critical services, and a few were piloting things like virtual desktops.

Niel Nickolaisen
The Real Niel
Niel Nickolaisen

Early this month, I conducted my newest virtualization survey and found that the "rolling" nature of our virtualization continues. By rolling, I mean that what was bleeding-edge a couple of years ago is now squarely in the mainstream.

Two years ago, desktop virtualization was new and somewhat experimental. Now, many of us have virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) pilots under way. Still others have figured out VDI completely. We also are shifting from on-premises virtualization to cloud services. 

Finally, we are extending virtualization to create more on-demand development and testing environments that mimic our entire production environments. Here's what CIOs need to know about the most compelling virtual systems in the enterprise.

Desktop virtualization

IT leaders have to determine whether they should implement a working VDI. Given the dramatic trend to using tablets and smartphones in the enterprise, most CIOs at least should get a working pilot into place. They won't last too long if their technology departments are in the business of saying "No" while everyone around them has become part of the tablet generation. 

In my own VDI projects, I have learned one critical lesson: VDI requires shifting the burden of processing from PCs or laptops to somewhere else. Such a shift often creates bottlenecks in the network or at the point of data I/O where the processing now takes place. In my case, we used wide-area-network acceleration to reduce the network bottleneck and a solid-state VDI appliance to eliminate the data center I/O constraint. This allowed us to deliver a virtual desktop to about 80% of our employees.

Cloud management

Once CIOs virtualized their servers and storage, they felt familiar and comfortable with virtual computing. That set the stage for them to extend virtual computing to someone else's servers and storage. Some have started with shifting "elastic" loads to the cloud. This is the beginning of another one of those virtualization "rolls." Two years from now, I expect many CIOs will be using the elastic nature of the cloud, while a smaller group will have shifted some of their normal production loads to the cloud.

Development and test environments

At least two things are colliding that require on-demand development and test environments that mimic the production environment exactly: servers, storage, network devices, integration points with internal and external systems, and so forth. Those two things are market dynamics and the increasing acceptance of Agile methods for software development and implementation. The short cycle times needed now require that we get development and testing right the first time. Virtualizing our servers and storage helps, but it doesn't get us all the way to a replica of our entire production environment.

In addition, as Agile methods become the norm, we have multiple project teams that all need their own pseudo production environment. In this area, I get the sense that we are one of those on the bleeding edge. We are trying both software and an appliance to mimic production. Admittedly, we are sorting through some implementation issues. One is that the tools are nascent. Another is that these production replicas have to be managed carefully. Because they are actual copies of the real production environment, naming conventions are critical lest someone unwittingly unleash an untested change into the real production environment.

In summary, I think virtualization is one of greatest tools ever created to make our lives better and to improve the service levels we provide our internal and external customers. I expect that two years from now, we will be looking for the next great use for virtualization -- mind reading, perhaps?

Niel Nickolaisen is CIO at Western Governors University in Salt Lake City. He is a frequent speaker, presenter and writer on IT's dual role enabling strategy and delivering operational excellence. Write to him at

This was last published in June 2012

Dig Deeper on Enterprise systems management



Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Join the conversation


Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

The article speaks of "most of us" and "many of us" doing this or that in virtualization. I am sure that "most of us" would agree that these are extremely vague references. "Many of us" would see that by using open ended adjectives instead of hard numbers or real data misleads the reader into thinking that virtualization is being done by "almost all of us". Those who see and understand the use of such open-ended statements would also probably agree that the author is submitting us to not a study that he has done, but only to his opinion. He has not defined who "us" is, who "most" is or even how "many" he is referring too. This could be a category of 1 or as many as 10,000 and who exactly are the "us" - CIOs in general, CIOs of universities, CIOs of universities in Utah, in Salt Lake or is it that the "us" he is referring is his staff? This would probably lead "some, many or even most of us" to believe that the whole article is hype and conjecture.
I can relate when the author says "most of us" since we are in a pilot mode and have been learning from other pilots in other organizations. However, since he mentioned "survey", it would have been good to share in %age terms to give more credibility to the article.