A data Rx that's hard to swallow

Analytics automation slip-ups have raised concerns about taking every data-driven Rx. #CIOChat-ters share their prescriptive analytics hesitations.

When you feel under the weather, you go to the doctor for a diagnosis. On most occasions, the doctor prescribes...

medication that could lead to undesirable side effects such as drowsiness, weight gain or even an allergic reaction -- the likes of which may discourage you from taking the prescription in the first place.

The same can be true for prescriptive analytics in an IT setting. Like a written Rx from a doctor, prescriptive analytics can be just what the doctor ordered to fix whatever ails your business, but there can also be unintended consequences of a wholesale embrace of data analytics and mining.

During SearchCIO's April tweet jam, we asked participants, "Are there situations where you wouldn't want to take the prescription even though you know it works?" In response, retail giant Target was called out for its analytics faux pas:

Target wasn't the only namedrop during the discussion. Other -- somewhat humorous -- examples of analytics-driven automation gone awry included social media friend-suggestion tools, automated marketing messages and group email:

SearchCIO has reported on the importance of mitigating security risks associated with human error by creating automated processes; but humans shouldn't be completely removed from data analysis. Organizations looking to prevent instances of machine error should consider human intervention somewhere in the analytics process.

More on prescriptive analytics

Prescriptive tips from CRI and Revlon

The future of business analytics

This echoes something Nate Silver, analytics expert and the founder of data-journalism hub FiveThirtyEight, has been talking about for quite some time: turning analytics over to the machines. At the Gartner Master Data Management (MDM) Summit last year, Silver cautioned, "Whatever you do, don't give in to the big data hype."

Our #CIOChat participants advised finding a balance between machine automation and human intervention when it comes to analytics:

Humans can't always intervene in order to set analytics straight, but when they can, who should lead the charge? SearchCIO Associate Site Editor Fran Sales asked tweet jammers:

In addition to those mentioned above, are there instances in which IT shouldn't take the analytics prescription, even when the data readily presents itself? When should humans intervene, and who should lead that effort? To read more conversations from this tweet jam, search #CIOChat on Twitter. Follow @SearchCIO to learn more about out next Twitter discussion scheduled for Wednesday, May 28, at 3 p.m. EDT.

This was last published in May 2014

Dig Deeper on Enterprise business intelligence software and big data

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Join the conversation

1 comment

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

Are there instances where IT shouldn't take the analytics prescription?
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchCompliance

SearchHealthIT

SearchCloudComputing

SearchMobileComputing

SearchDataCenter

Close