Home > CIO News > CIO alert: Watch out for project management stresses
CIO News:
EMAIL THIS

CIO alert: Watch out for project management stresses

By Gopal K. Kapur
18 Jan 2006 | SearchCIO.com

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   

During the past six months, two CIOs asked me to analyze why five project deployments spanning sales, fulfillment and customer service had failed.

The budget for each project ranged from $500,000 to $1 million, and development time from seven to 11 months. Interviews with project managers revealed that despite numerous project management governance problems, four out of the five projects progressed fairly well to the end of their build phases.

But as these projects moved into customer testing, training and implementation cycles, problems emerged. Eventually, three projects were canceled before implementation, and two were canceled three months into the operations stage. In-depth assessment of the development history of these projects showed that high customer stress was the primary source of failure.

The following five factors determined customer stress levels:

Customer time spent away from primary responsibility. The projects required a high proportion--frequently 40%--of customers' time for requirements definition, design reviews and implementation training. No action had been taken to reduce customers' day-to-day responsibilities despite the fact that compensation was based on job performance. As a result, most customers didn't devote the necessary time to new projects. On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest, customer stress--based on time away from primary responsibility--scored a 4.0.

Degree of change. All five projects involved a high degree of change in technology, workflow processes and level of customer accountability. Project managers had overlooked the effort customers needed to expend to learn the new technology, especially the new navigation protocols. The prevailing attitude among the sponsors (all of whom were members of IT) was that customers would simply have to adjust to the new processes. But customers failed to, and consequently customer stress scored between 3.5 and 4.5.

CIO Executive Guides

Risk management

CRM projects

Willingness to accept change. My experience shows that customers' willingness to adopt new processes is directly proportional to the goodwill that project teams build with them. Here consistent and sustained effort from project sponsors and champion stakeholders is a must. In all five projects, management was only minimally involved, and champion stakeholders supported the project poorly. Customer stress scored between 3.0 and 4.0.

Ability to accept change. This is directly related to the quality of customer training and support. In three projects, training was hit-and-miss because multiple schedule slippages resulted in last-minute postponement of training sessions. In addition, most of the training documentation was posted online, and customers found the training materials difficult to use. During the first few weeks of project deployment, many customers ran the old system for their routine business, resulting in extensive after-hours work. Customer stress scored between 3.0 and 4.5.

Timing of change. The fulfillment and customer support projects were deployed at the height of the annual sales cycle, creating extensive overtime. The primary reason for poor timing was slipped schedules on three of the projects. Management's decision not to provide work relief to customers further complicated these problems. Customer stress scored between 4.0 and 4.5.

The aggregate customer stress rating for the five projects fell between 17.5 and 21.5, toward the high end of the stress scale. No wonder the five projects imploded.

CIOs must ensure that project managers assess the customer stress factor as a part of the project planning process and then diligently monitor and report this vital sign to project sponsors. My experience with scores of similar failed projects shows that most project management methodologies ignore this critical assessment.

Gopal K. Kapur is president of the Center for Project Management in San Ramon, Calif., and author of Project Management for Information, Technology, Business and Certification. Write to him at ProjectExpert@ciodecisions.com.



Tags: IT spending and budgetingLeadership and strategic planningIT governanceIT project management and portfolio managementIT staff development and retentionVIEW ALL TAGS

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   



RELATED CONTENT
IT spending and budgeting
Gartner's top 10 strategic technologies for 2010
Recession squeezing IT disaster recovery budgets
Latest cloud computing trend: End users buying IT as a Service
How will IT outsourcing play out in companies' recovery plans?
Enterprise risk management quiz for CIOs
IT insourcing can bring jobs, cost savings back in-house, experts say
Seeking affordable DR in Azerbaijan: IBM, SunGard, are you listening?
Managing IT spending cuts: Don't take the easy way out, CIO advises
SOA success stories involve business process management
Best practices for managing IT and the recession

Leadership and strategic planning
The Real Business of IT: Download a free chapter
Gartner's top 10 strategic technologies for 2010
Qualities of a great leader from Jim Collins
Lean thinking in IT: Case studies and advice from practitioners
FAQ: IT and organizational change management
ITSM and ITIL best practices for process improvement
Maturing an ITIL strategy beyond incident, problem, change management
CIO management mistakes that can harm CIO careers, cause IT failures
Do you have the qualities of a good leader? Test your leadership IQ
Google Wave: A sea change for business collaboration, communication?

IT governance
How Virginia's new CIO is fixing the state's IT outsourcing problems
Six ways to fail with your SOA implementation
Agile development methodology not easy but worth the effort, users say
Botched IT outsourcing contract shows need for governance, SLAs
Multi-sourcing requires IT governance strategy with multiple tiers
Looking for low-cost business processes? Check out GE WorkOut and FTD
Uniting ITSM, PPM process methodologies yields IT management benefits
What's your beef with the agile development methodology?
PPM and IT governance in a recession: A guide for enterprise CIOs
Project management governance: How much is enough?

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
GRC (governance, risk management and compliance) software  (SearchCIO.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary



CIO solution center has news, research, and guides to assist the unique challenges of the CIO
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
SEARCH 
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2007 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts