News Stay informed about the latest enterprise technology news and product updates.

Cloud adoption rates down? Yes, but not really

A recent industry report had a finding anyone in IT right now would find arresting: Cloud adoption rates have dipped.

Me: Come again?

Report: Usage of cloud applications is down from 2014. For example, 35% of surveyed organizations are using cloud analytics software. Two years ago, 53% did. Cloud email, collaboration, customer relationship management and financial apps all saw usages drops.

CompTIA’s latest “Trends in Cloud Computing” delivered the dramatic news.

It was the second cloud double take I had done this fall. Last week I wrote on Boston footwear manufacturer New Balance’s underwhelmed regard for cloud computing — at least, as the sole processing power behind an expansion that includes opening stores on several continents and developing its custom footwear services. This, from a company that, according to Ravi Shankavaram, its vice president of IT, has adopted a “cloud-first” strategy. Was an anti-cloud front moving in?

Hardly. Gartner predicts the public cloud market to grow 16.5% in 2016, to $204 billion. IDC forecasts spending on cloud infrastructure this year to increase 16.2%, to $37.4 billion. And Morgan Stanley found earlier this year that cloud is one of CIOs’ top spending projects in 2016 and predicted that 30% of application workloads will move to the public cloud by the end of next year.

Deciphering dipping digits

CompTIA knew that reported decreases in cloud adoption rates would cause some surprise, so it painted the context.

“In the early days of cloud, employees likely assumed that any off-premise application was cloud-based,” the report explained. “With a greater appreciation for cloud-specific characteristics, employees are honing their assessment.”

In other words, people know more about cloud now, so they’re more careful about IT services they’re taking on as cloud — and they can more accurately distinguish between cloud and non-cloud applications.

Vendors are partly responsible for the confusion; many label computing services that aren’t cloud cloud in hopes of drawing buyers. It’s a phenomenon known as cloud washing. For example, managed hosting — leased servers dedicated for a specific client — doesn’t always offer the same scalability and other benefits as true cloud options do.

Lauren Nelson, an analyst at Forrester Research, said she’s skeptical about numbers that say spending on cloud services are going down. Another explanation, she said, is users overstated their original adoption levels, or it could be other factors.

“Is it a developer answering that question? Is it an end user? What were the different data sources? Were there inconsistencies in that data set? I’d question a lot of that.”

The gathering cloud

Nelson said she hasn’t seen apps moving away from the public cloud; in fact, they’re expanding in it.

“This past year we saw the first interest and increase in cloud migration efforts versus building net new apps in the cloud, which is what the story has been over the last however many years,” she said.

CompTIA agrees, saying that the declines in cloud adoption rates — or “rebalancing” of how organizations do cloud assessments — do not signal that the market is in decline.

“Cloud, then, will be a major part of the enterprise technology landscape,” CompTIA said in the report. “A greater part of the total IT spend will shift to cloud technology, and cloud offerings will also expand budgets as they expand the limits of what a business is able to accomplish.”

So read the numbers, and rebalance yourself.

Join the conversation

4 comments

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

Hi Frank, what are your thoughts on Brian Madden's comments from his March 11 article on the differences between Remote FX and HDX? i.e. "The biggest difference between RDP with RemoteFX and Citrix HDX is that Microsoft is supporting only RemoteFX connections from clients running Windows 7 SP1, Windows 7 or WES9 Embedded, or dedicated thin clients. So there will be no RemoteFX connects from Macs, Androids, iPhones, iPads, or Windows XP or Vista clients. But Citrix HDX works on all of these.

Also, RemoteFX is a LAN-only feature, so not only do you need a very specific client to use it, but you must also connect to a RemoteFX host that's on your same high-speed LAN. Citrix HDX, of course, works great on the WAN. (Microsoft RDP without RemoteFX can also work across the WAN, though not as well as HDX.)

Do these differences still stand or are you saying that Brian's previous comments are no longer relevant?

Regards,

Norman
Cancel
Hi, this is Brian Madden.. not sure if my user name will show through here or not. A couple things though:

First, remember that this article is about Windows 8, which isn't out yet. So who knows what Microsoft will end up supporting when they finally release it, but the info that I wrote this past March is still relevant today and until Windows 8 comes out.

That said, Microsoft has announced plans to make RemoteFX work better over the WAN and, as Frank mentioned, to make it work without physical GPUs in the host. But we don't know how well either of those will perform since Windows 8 is not out yet.

Finally, when it comes to clients, I still see Microsoft only supporting Windows-based rich clients and thin clients.. I'm not sure that we'll see an Android or iPad RemoteFX client from Microsoft anytime soon. :)
Cancel
The info in the article is based upon what Microsoft demonstrated and spoke about during their windows 8 reviewers work shop. That said, it is easy to see that Microsoft could choose to change much between now and when windows 8 finally arrives next year (fingers crossed). However, one thing is certain and that is performance over the wan is a critical element, especially if MS wants to attain remote desktop nirvana - and ms is putting a lot of effort into that element.
Time will only tell if MS decides to support more than windows devices and how well that support will work - it is obviously not their focus at this time, but may become a critical capability in the future to extend market share
Cancel
I'm confused by this article. It seems to be highlighting RD Virtualization Host but says it's for RDSH formerly Terminal Services. There's a huge difference.
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchCompliance

SearchHealthIT

SearchCloudComputing

SearchMobileComputing

SearchDataCenter

Close